The Andhra Pradesh fiasco: Who resigned, and when?

By S Sudhir Kumar on May 22, 2013

Sabitha Indra Reddy threatens to resign

The resignation drama of two charge-sheeted Ministers in Andhra Pradesh has not just set off a flurry of political activity in the State, but has also set off a flurry of news activity on ‘national’ media. However, in a tearing hurry to come up with a 5-10 minutes slot, most of them presented poorly researched news bits on this issue (which includes trying to credit the high-command for resignations).
The following timeline explains why it is entirely wrong to credit the high-command, how the “collective responsibility” of the Cabinet has been abused, and how the State is the ultimate sufferer in this fiasco under the leadership of Sonia Gandhi’s Congress.
March – May, 2012
The Supreme Court of India has issued notices to six Ministers and eight IAS officers in Andhra Pradesh, asking them to explain why they should not be interrogated by the CBI in GO’s issued by them, that purportedly favoured Jagan. The details of these 26 GO’s are appended at the end of this article.
The names of the six Ministers are Sabitha Indra Reddy, Geetha Reddy, Dharmana Prasada Rao, Ponnala Lakshmaih, Kanna Lakshminarayana and Mopidevi Venkataramana.
The State Government agreed to provide legal assistance to all these six Ministers and eight IAS officers, primarily because it believed no wrongdoing was resorted to by the Ministers.
Venkataramana meanwhile got ensconced into a excise scam too and had resigned. Immediately after that, the CBI arrested him in the Jagan disproportionate assets case. In his resignation letter, the Minister clearly mentioned that he merely followed the orders of the then Congress CM, YSR. Many Ministerial colleagues echoed the same sentiment directly on TV.
May – August 2012
The CBI continued it’s investigations, and in August filed another set of charge-sheets. In this, it named Dharmana Prasada Rao as an accused. Since he was charge-sheeted, Dharmana Prasada Rao submitted his resignation to the Chief Minister. The CBI also applied for permission from the CM to allow for prosecution of Prasada Rao. Please note that Prasada Rao submitted his resignation in August 2012.
August, 2012 to March, 2013
Because he submitted his resignation, Mr. Prasada Rao stayed away from office. There was immense pressure on the Chief Minister and the Congress high-command to not accept this resignation and also to not grant permission to the CBI for prosecuting Prasada Rao. The CBI permission has to be granted within 3 months. Just a few days before the 3-month period was ending, in an extraordinary move, the CM placed the CBI request before the Cabinet. The Cabinet, in its entirety (barring a dissent note by one Minister), decided to reject permission to the CBI. This is perhaps the first and only time in the history of our country that the Cabinet had to take a decision on granting permission to the CBI!
Prasada Rao’s resignation was never accepted nor was it rejected. He purposely stayed away from attending his office in the Secretariat for a whopping 7 months. With the Chief Minsiter suggesting to him that he start attending office and cabinet meetings, Mr. Prasada Rao resumed normal duties in March 2013.
It is very important to not that all this while, all these moves had the explicit support of this very high command of the Congress.
March – May 2013
Meanwhile, the CBI filed another charge-sheet and this time named Sabita Indra Reddy as an accused. Sabita followed the same script as Prasada Rao. She submitted her resignation in April. It was neither accepted nor rejected. The Chief Minister stood behind both these Ministers, with the explicit support of the high-command. Sabita also did not attend office for 19 days (peanuts compared to the 7-month absence by Prasada Rao) and recently resumed duties. It is again very important to note that the high-command did not raise an alarm for having two charge-sheeted Ministers in the Cabinet.
May 2013
As is the norm, a couple of scandals rocked the UPA Government. Sonia Gandhi was forced to drop two Central Ministers. This sparked off a vociferous demand, not just from Opposition parties, but from Congress leaders too. How can we have one standard for Delhi and one for AP? The Chief Minister of AP went to Delhi (folks in AP lost count of the number of visits he made to Delhi) and the culmination of this fiasco was supposed to be the resignation of these two Ministers.
Now, the two Ministers have reminded the Press that they had already submitted their resignations (in August and April) and yet no decision has been taken. Instead of accepting it then, a picture is being painted now that the high-command has asked them to resign (again!). PC Chacko in his Press conference hoped that the Ministers will resign ‘voluntarily’. Guess what? They already did and the high-command didn’t accept them! It is a pity that none of the journalists present there questioned him on this. Prasada Rao is deeply upset that he was forced to stay on and is now being forced to go away – justifiable anger, but he is helpless! Both Ministers have announced that they haven’t presented any new letters and have told the Chief Minister to act on their earlier letters. Please note that as of now, the resignations have not been accepted!
The 26 GO’s pertain to allocation of land/exemption on levy of duties etc to various companies that have reportedly helped YSR/Jagan companies. Any decision to allot even a small piece of land has to be approved by the Cabinet. This implies that all these decisions have gone through the Cabinet. How then can one Minister be blamed for this? What exactly is the extent of this corruption scam in Andhra Pradesh? CBI has spoken to the remaining 3 Ministers too but is yet to name them as accused.
The ‘national’ media suddenly woke up yesterday and started posing some questions without a clear background of the entire issue – perhaps it is now naïve to expect them to be fully aware of happenings in Congress-ruled AP! One anchor was astonished in his show last night when he mentioned that there is a ‘litany’ of scams in AP. Wonder what stopped him and others from debating these much earlier?
The 26 GOs and what the CBI says about them:
The Andhra Pradesh fiasco: Who resigned, and when?
Posted in Andhra Pradesh, Anti-national Congress Party | 1 Comment

Dialogue With Pak Cannot Resolve Kashmir Issue: Swamy

http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=798750

Janata Party President Subramanian Swamy today said India should not have any dialogue with Pakistan on Kashmir since it is an integral part of this country.

Swamy, who is here for the National Council meeting of Janata Party here, said the only “unfinished agenda” on Kashmir is to get back the part of the state which is under the occupation of Pakistan.

“Let me make it clear that dialogue with Pakistan cannot resolve Kashmir issue. There should be no talks with Pakistan on Kashmir,” Swamy told reporters here.

Swamy also said there was a need for a new approach for resolution of problems faced by people of Kashmir.

Asked about his party’s stand on Article 370 of the Constitution granting special status to Kashmir, Swamy said the provision has been violated by militants by driving away Kashmiri Pandits from the valley.

In reply to a question, Swamy said the BJP-led NDA will come to power in the next Lok Sabha elections due next year as the ruling UPA has been a “total failure”.

Swamy said corruption, national unity and fight against terrorism will be the main issues during the polls.

On the IPL controversy, he demanded stern punishment for those involved in the spot-fixing scandal.

Swamy also said IPL should be allowed to remain as a sport and that people with no connection with cricket should be kept away from the administration of the game.

Posted in Anti-national Congress Party, Dr.Subramanian Swamy, Kashmir, Pakistan | Leave a comment

Advaniji may laud sacking of Lehar Singh Siroya, but should listen to Praveen Patil if BJP has to win 2014 Lok Sabha polls.

On reading Advani’s blog… — Praveen Patil. Advaniji may laud sacking of Lehar Singh Siroya, but should listen to Praveen Patil if BJP has to win 2014 Lok Sabha polls.

Kalyanaraman

On reading Advani’s blog…

By Praveen Patil on May 18, 2013

Dear Advaniji,

Sir, I have had the good fortune of attending more than a dozen of your public rallies across many cities and States over the last two decades; the latest being the one you addressed in the national college grounds of Bangalore in 2011 as part of your nationwide rath yatra against corruption. If you remember sir, in late 2011, when you addressed a mammoth rally of some 30 thousand odd people in Bangalore, it had started to rain heavily just as you began to speak. Organisers and BJP functionaries were worried that the people would rush out of the national college grounds to protect themselves from the wrath of the rain gods. But nothing of that sort happened on that day. People simply stood up and picked up the plastic chairs to raise them above their heads to shield themselves. They braved that incessant Bangalore rain to listen to you. That is how much the people of Bangalore and India loved you and respected you.

Exactly two decades ago, in 1991, you and Vajpayee ji addressed a huge rally in Mumbai where I was once again fortunate enough to be present. If you remember sir, the moment you faced the mike to speak out, there was an uproarious cry of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ from the gathered masses. Even though Vajpayee ji was known for his oratorical skills, a vast majority of the people in that gathering had come to listen to you, that is how much the people of Mumbai and India loved you and respected you.

Alas! Love and respect of the ordinary masses come with a sell-by date. Retirement at the peak is an art that Indians have rarely understood, thus we have a 40 something Sachin Tendulkar still wanting to play a game which has long moved past him. Advani ji, every day that you spend involved in active politics is costing you the love of a million of your fans / followers. Please ask yourself tonight after dinner, is the opium of active politics more important than the love and respect of ordinary Indians?

History is an unkindest of judges that human civilisation has bestowed upon us. History has no time for subtleties for it is devoid of human emotions and lacks the leisure of deciphering intentions. If history can be cruel enough to degrade the architect of Indian economic reforms into a modern day Nero who presided over the most corrupt regime India had ever seen, then history can be equally scathing to judge the father of modern India’s right-wing movement as just a faction leader of the BJP. This is how much time and tide have turned against you, sir.

Karnataka is the latest symptom of the disease

The BJP of Karnataka is not a disease sir, it is just the symptom of the underlying illness that the party is suffering from. Losing Karnataka is not the antidote for that disease as you have wrongly prescribed, in fact, the very opposite is true.

One of the last decisions that you, as the patriarch and guide, should take before quitting active politics is to assert that BJP is a political party and not a voluntary organisation. Sir, in a democracy, a political party exists to win elections and not to win TV studio debates or hash tag wars on Twitter. BJP is not RSS.

By choosing electoral defeat as a way forward to cure the perceived moral decline, you are committing a crime sir. It is a criminal act against the vast number of ordinary karyakartas of Karnataka who, by their sweat and blood, brought your party to power in south India. Pray, what are you telling these ordinary karyakartas? You are telling them that their sweat and blood was in vain, because you have decided to surrender the State to win a hollow moral victory over Congress/UPA in television studios!

Sir, you have always been politically correct in your utterances and actions over the decades. You have always addressed even your worst enemies with utmost respect. In fact, despite all her misdeeds and corruption, you have always addressed Sonia Gandhi as ‘Sonia ji’. Thus, to see you use a pejorative term of ‘Yeddi’ to address the former CM of Karnataka, was heart-breaking to say the least. Ask yourself sir, is this the way you would treat someone who has toiled hard for more than 4 decades to build your party in a south-Indian State, notwithstanding whatever differences you have developed lately? If the most vile and most corrupt ‘Sonia ji’ has acquired more respect in your political lexicon than the unwashed Yeddyurappa, then am afraid Indian Right has hit a new nadir.

The abolition of Jagirdari system and the Jan Sangh/BJP’s growth in Rajasthan is an inspiring tale indeed. But, sir, that is totally out of context to the Karnataka conundrum. What is more relevant to Karnataka is what happened in UP just a decade or so ago. The caste-matrix of Karnataka has its parallels in the muddy politics of UP and not in the royally majestic Rajasthan.

In Uttar Pradesh too, a section of upper caste BJP leaders decided to lose an election just to wrest the control of the party from Kalyan Singh. One election loss proved to be one too many, until today, when the BJP has been reduced to a bit player in the largest State.

If UP-isation of Karnataka is the solitary goal that BJP can aim at, then bringing back Yeddyurappa after a decade in wilderness, when he would be a spent force, is the ideal path to follow. Is this what you want to achieve Advani ji? Or do you believe that Anant Kumar ji will wake up one day and suddenly find himself the darling of Kannadigas by sheer magic? Let me remind you sir, that the possibility of the Kalraj Mishras and Lalji Tandons ever becoming mass leaders shrinks from 10 per cent to 3 per cent by the time it reaches the Anant Kumars and Prahlad Joshis, while traversing from UP to Karnataka.

Can the lies of the media beguile the patriarch?

For someone with such a legendary political acumen, it is surprising to note this new-found belief in unverified news reports churned by the usual suspects of Indian mainstream media. Sir, do you sincerely believe that Sonia Gandhi is acting against the corrupt Ministers of the UPA Government against the wishes of the PM? At the same time, you seem to believe that Yeddyurappa indulged in “unabashed corruption” as the CM of Karnataka!

Such callous statements by one of the founding fathers of the BJP leave not only the loyal karyakartas but us ordinary followers in complete disarray. When and how did you decide that Sonia-led Congress is fighting corruption, while BSY was the epitome of immorality?

Sir, you must pay a private visit to Bangalore, while you are at it, just take along any businessman well-versed with Bangalore’s realty scenario for a guided tour of the city and its surroundings. If you ever venture out to do so, you will get the real picture. You will find out that vast tracts of land belong to various politicians of many political parties. “SM Krishna’s son in law”, “Dharam Singh’s son”, “Deve Gowda’s relatives”, “Kumaraswamy” and even “Muttappa Rai” would be some of the names you will hear in this connection. The missing name will be that of “Yeddiyurappa and his sons or relatives”. That is the story that you have totally missed in your blind love for a certain Bangalore MP. The media and the intellectual brigade have either beguiled you with partial facts or you have deliberately chosen to remain blind.

Karnataka is not an exception sir, India is at stake here. Do we Indians deserve another UPA term, just so that you can play your moral one-upmanship? India is fed up with Congress and its non-governance, but please spare the country a moral lecture from Dilli and instead offer a winning alternative. If there is one thing and the only thing that you can do as your last act of nirvana, please liberate BJP from the clutches of Dilli. That should be the only lesson that BJP should learn from Karnataka, rest is all gloss.

Thank You,

A disheartened BJP supporter

http://www.niticentral.com/2013/05/18/on-reading-advanis-blog-79264.html

BJP sacks Karnataka treasurer for attack on Advani
PTI Bangalore, May 17, 2013

BJP has sacked the Treasurer of the Karnataka unit, Lehar Singh Siroya, for his attack on party stalwart L K Advani.

Siroya, an aide of former chief minister and Karnataka Janatha Paksha supremo B S Yeddyurappa, in an open letter had alleged that Advani had compromised on corruption whenever it suited him.

BJP state unit President Prahlad Joshi on Friday suspended him from the party with immediate effect and relieved him from the post of treasurer.

The party dismissed Siroya’s allegations against Advani as “false” and “baseless”.

First Published: 19:28 IST(17/5/2013) | Last Updated: 19:29 IST(17/5/2013)

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Bangalore/BJP-sacks-Karnataka-treasurer-for-attack-on-Advani/Article1-1061690.aspx

http://bharatkalyan97.blogspot.ca/2013/05/on-reading-advanis-blog-praveen-patil.html

Posted in BJP, Secularist terrorism in India, Sonia and Mafia | 1 Comment

Sh Ram Chandra Vinayak Godse / Sh Nathuram Vinayak Godse

http://businessachivers.blogspot.in/2013/05/sh-ram-chandra-vinayak-godse-vinayak.html

Friday, May 17, 2013

Sh Ram Chandra Vinayak Godse / 
 
 Sh Nathuram Vinayak Godse
 
 

“Desh Bhakti Hai Paap Yadi to Mai hoon paapi Ghor Bhayankar,

Hai yadi yah Punya Karya to Mera hai adhikar Punya par,


Atal Khada mai iss vedi par “

 
 
 
 
A fact,
 
” 19 May 1949 while Nathuram was at Shimla.Dattatraya, who was released from detention from the Yeravada Central Prison (Pune, Maharashtra) a few months earlier, had gone to Simla to attend the Court for hearing the proceedings. In the evening of the 19th May, he was preparing to go to see Nathuram to greet him on the occasion of his birthday, when a girl came to see him.  Dattatraya had casually seen her in the court.  The girl requested Dattatraya to take her to Nathuram as she wanted to see him.But, Dattatraya told her only relatives are permitted.She relied :I shall manage that.  Simply take me to the cell where he is lodged. She then disclosed her identity. She was the daughter of a sitting High Court Judge but not on the Bench which was hearing the appeals. She had a small basket of fruit and some flowers. The authorities noted the name of Dattatraya as the only visitor and allowed the girl to accompany him. The girl paid her respects to Nathuram, and offered the flowers and fruit to him.  In a few words she expressed her appreciation.  From the bottom of the basket she took out a sweater.  She wanted it to pass on to Nathuram. The officer on duty checked it and allowed.Wear this sweater one day while arguing the case. I shall feel happy.She said. Nathuram thanked her and agreed to wear it. The late Maulana Azad has observed in his book, India Wins Freedom on page 225, ‘Some women from respectable families sent him (Nathuram) a sweater they had knitted for him’,  whereby he wanted to show how even the elite classes also considered Nathuram a hero.  It was a fact.”
 
 
A Patriot whose patriotism is ether maliciously misinterpreted or tactfully undermined 
 
If any one thinks he was Communal,or Anti National it would be wrong & proof of person’s mental disability. Government of India had & has suppressed many to be correct all things about him. His & Book on Him “Gandhi wadh Kyun & Gandhi wadh aur Mai”,statements, letters etc. were all banned from the public until recently,I cant understand Govt’s Motive Behind it.
 
If He was so called Hindu Fanatic or Communal he would have gone out killing Muslims,as doing sewa in Refugee camp he would have visualized the atrocities through Hindu’s went in Pakistan, but not even a single incident proves this.
 
Going by his article,Letters,Statement and book by his brother on him one thing comes out in a clear way; He was no fanatic.His brilliant statement in court provide’s his mental stability and commitment to nation nothing else,During his statement he showed his respect to Gandhiji, He never even once spoke wrong about him as a invidual,he only condemned His & congress policies which were sabotaging Nation maa Bharti. We should also understand his anger as He along with several others had been working with the Hindu refugees fleeing from Pakistan.Naration of Inhumanity,Animal like behaviour,Rape etv committed on them was boiling like LAVA in him the same feeling which will come in our mind if it happens to any of our family member.Fact is for him Nation was his family.
 
Justice Khosla’s Observation (
The

full Bench of the East Punjab High Court comprising Justice Amarnath Bhandari,

Achhru Ram and Gopaldas Khosla)

 
“The

highlight of the appeal before us was the discourse delivered by Nathuram Godse

in his defence. He spoke for several hours discussing, in the first instance,

the facts of the case and then the motive that had prompted him to take Mahatma

Gandhi’s life. The audience was visibly and audibly moved. There was a deep

silence when he ceased speaking. Many women were in tears and men were coughing,and searching for their handkerchiefs. This silence was accentuated and madedeeper by the sound of an occasional subdued sniff or a muffled cough. I have however no doubt that had the audience of that day been constituted into a jury and entrusted with the task of deciding Godse’s appeal, they would have brought in a verdict of ‘not guilty’ by an overwhelming majority”

 

 
“The other one was when Shri C.K. Daphtary in the midst of his argument referred to the incident of the assassination as an immoral act. Nathuram stood up and took a strong exception to it. At least as far as this case is concerned the Prosecution has no right to discuss the morality of the act, nor does the Court, I humbly submit, have any jurisdiction to decide that issue. The concept of morality would be seen to be changing from society to society, from country to country and from century to century. In a particular society it would be considered immoral for women not to use the veil (parda), while in others it may be perfectly moral. In some countries drinking liquor would not be considered immoral at all. In a certain century teaching Vedic lore to the non-Brahmins might have been looked upon as highly immoral, but today it is not. Such is the way concepts of morality go on changing. The Court only has jurisdiction to decide the legality or otherwise of my action but in so far as morality is concerned, it is a matter of my conviction that what I did was wholly moral and upon those convictions, this Court has no jurisdiction”.
 
 

He very well understood He,His Family,His Community,His Friends will be ruined after his Act,But then also he went with it as Nation was more important for him,Though by some stupid Communist mentality and Secular Idiot writer say he was plotted & brain washed by Hindu leaders.which only shows there Macaulay syndrome nothing else.   

The central government had taken a decision; Pakistan will not be given Rs 55 crores. On January 13 Gandhi started a fast unto death that Pakistan must be given the money. On January 13, the central government changed its earlier decision and announced that Pakistan would be given the amount. On January 13, Nathuram decided to assassinate Gandhi.

Nathuram Godse was a educated,intelligent & editor of  ”Agrani” (one of the most famous newspaper of that time – with Nana Aapte). In his last editorial of “Agrani” which he changed overnight – he said “Gandhi must be stopped – at any cost” and he justified why Gandhiji’s assassination was not only inevitable but also a delayed action, sth tht shud’ve happened LONG AGO.

Nathuram’s Said ” I don’t refute Gandhi’s theory of non-violence. He may be a saint but he is not a politician. His theory of non-violence denies self-defence and self-interest. The non-violence that defines the fight for survival as violence is a theory not of non-violence but of self-destruction.The division of the nation was an unnecessary decision. What was the percentage of the Muslim population as compared to the population of the nation? There was no need for a separate nation. Had it been a just demand, Maulana Azad would not have stayed back in India. But because Jinnah insisted and because Gandhi took his side, India was divided, in spite of opposition from the nation, the Cabinet. An individual is never greater than a nation.

In a democracy you cannot put forward your demands at knife-point. Jinnah did it and Gandhi stabbed the nation with the same knife. He dissected the land and gave a piece to Pakistan. We did picket that time but in vain. The Father of our Nation went to perform his paternal duties for Pakistan! Gandhi blackmailed the cabinet with his fast unto death. His body, his threats to die are causing the destruction — geographical as well as economical — of the nation. Today, Muslims have taken a part of the nation, tomorrow Sikhs may ask for Punjab. The religions are again dividend into castes, they will demand sub-divisions of the divisions. What remains of the concept of one nation, national integration? Why did we fight the British in unison for independence? Why not separately? Bhagat Singh did not ask only for an independent Punjab or Subhash Chandra Bose for an independent Bengal?

I am going to assassinate him in the open, before the public, because I am going to do it as my duty. If I do it surreptitiously, it becomes a crime in my own eyes. I will not try to escape, I will surrender and naturally I will be hanged. One assassination, one hanging. I don’t want two executions for one assassination.

On January 30, I reached Birla Bhavan at 12 pm. Gandhi was sitting outside on a cot enjoying the sunshine. Vallabhbhai Patel’s granddaughter was sitting at his feet. I had the revolver with me. I could have assassinated him easily then, but I was convinced that his assassination was to be a punishment and a sentence against him, and I would execute him. I wanted witnesses for the execution but there were none. I did not want to escape after the execution as there was not an iota of guilt in my mind. I wanted to surrender, but surrender to whom? There was a good crowd to collect for the evening prayers. I decided on the evening of January 30 as the date for Gandhi’s execution.

Gandhi climbed the steps and came forward. He had kept his hands on the shoulders of the two girls. I wanted just three seconds more. I moved two steps forward and faced Gandhi. Now I wanted to take out the revolver and salute him for whatever sacrifice and service he had made for the nation. One of the two girls was dangerously close to Gandhi and I was afraid that she might be injured in the course of firing. As a precautionary measure I went one more step ahead, bowed before him and gently pushed the girl away from the firing line. The next moment I fired at Gandhi. Gandhi was very weak, there was a feeble sound like ‘aah’ (Gandhi did NOT say “Hey Ram”) from him and he fell down.

After the firing I raised my hand holding the revolver and shouted, ‘Police, police’. For 30 seconds nobody came forward and I scanned the crowd. I saw a police officer. I signalled to him to come forward and arrest me. He came and caught my wrist, then a second man came and touched the revolver… I let it go… ,   Violence, Non-Violence I don’t really understand. Are we saying we got Independence without violence? Then what was that what happened to the refugees (from both sides) during the partition (partition for the sake of whom and for whom). And what is that, that we still face when we get our young soldiers back in coffins. And we have political scams involved in these coffins too. We have paid very dearly and still are and with blood (violence vice-verse).”

 
Sh Nathuram
 
1 Born :19 May 1910 ,Baramati,Maharashtra,born a Chitpavan Brahmin
2 Swargwas : 15 November 1949,Ambala
At birth, he was named Ramachandra,Nathuram was given his name because of an unfortunate incident. Before he was born, his parents had three sons and a daughter, with all three boys dying in their infancy. Fearing a curse that targeted male children, young Ramachandra was brought up as a girl for the first few years of his life, including having his nose pierced and being made to wear a nose-ring (nath in Marathi). It was then that he earned the nickname “Nathuram” (literally “Ram with a nose-ring”).
4 Godse started a Marathi newspaper for Hindu Mahasabha called Agrani, which some years later was renamed Hindu Rashtra.
5 Godse staunchly opposed Untouchability. Against all orders he  saved a dalit kid from falling into a well.
6 He was offered good Govt job as his dad was govt employee, but he refused as he supported Gandhi ji’s non-coop movement
7 Before going to Delhi, he took to Insurance policies with nominees as Bro Gopal’s wife n Friend Narayan Apte’s wife
8 He Liked Coffee & Cigarettes
9 He didn’t hate MKG. His disillusionment came when Gandhi ji started appeasing Muslims at cost of Hindus.
10 As a mark of Respect to Gandhi ji he touched his feet,and for safety sake he pushed lady by his side.

Thanks & Regards 

Arun Kumar Tiwari
Posted in Heros of India, Nehru-Gandhi traitors of India | 3 Comments

Advani, Swaraj can’t wash their hands off BJP’s Karnataka defeat

http://www.firstpost.com/politics/advani-swaraj-can-never-wash-their-hands-off-bjps-humiliating-defeat-in-karnataka-794181.html

By Paranjoy Guha Thakurta and Patrick SL Ghose

It was noon on Friday, 17 May, when a terse letter arrived at the Bengaluru residence of businessman-politician Lehar Singh Siroya. The letter was from Prahlad Joshi, president of the Karnataka unit of the Bharatiya Janata Party, informing the recipient, a member of the state’s legislative council, that he had been suspended as treasurer of the party’s state unit, a post he had held for seven years.

What was Siroya’s fault? He had written an angry letter four days earlier to the BJP’s senior most leader in New Delhi, former Deputy Prime Minister Lal Kishan Advani, telling him that he and the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj should not be laying all the blame for their party’s humiliating defeat in the state assembly elections on former Karnataka Chief Minister BS Yeddyurappa.

He firmly stated that Advani and Swaraj should accept their own responsibility for the pathetic condition of the Hindu nationalist party in the only state in southern India that it has been able to come to power on its own. (See Siroya’s 13 May letter to Advani, copies of which were marked to BJP president Rajnath Singh and others.)

Siroya told Firstpost over the phone on Friday evening: “I held a mirror up to the party and they decided to smash the mirror.”

Was he reacting in pique because he is a loyalist of the former Karnataka Chief Minister — as has been claimed by the Times of India — who was thrown out because the state Lokayukta Justice N. Santosh Hegde had indicted him for blatant acts of corruption. “I am not a loyalist of Yeddyurappaji. My loyalties are not to any individual but to the party,” Siroya claimed.

His ouster from the post of treasurer is a knee-jerk reaction to the 13 May letter he wrote to  Advani, in response to the latter’s blog of 12 May in which he laid the blame for the BJP’s recent rout in the Karnataka assembly elections squarely on Yeddyurappa.

Advani wrote: “Let me first point out that BJP did not throw out Yeddi; it is he who broke away from the BJP and decided to form a factional party of his own, the KJP. In fact, when it became apparent that he was unabashedly indulging in corruption, if the party had immediately taken firm action, the course of events would have been quite different.”

Siroya’s response the following day was — to use his words— to hold up a mirror to his party’s top brass. “I, as a humble worker, want to pose some questions to you on your perception of the malaise that has afflicted the Karnataka unit of the party. Before I get into the details, let me tell you that you are being contradictory, partisan and shielding your own role in the decline of the party in the state. In my opinion, if you were, in the past, as candid and uncompromising as today, we would have perhaps never reached this situation.”

Siroya then goes on to list thirteen points wherein he seeks to hold Advani and Swaraj responsible for the decline of the BJP in the state. He wrote to Advani: “Have you ever questioned Sushmaji on her long association with the mining mafia and the nature of that association which is a subject of drawing room and newsroom gossip? The mining mafia referred to her always as their mother and she basked in that affection for years.”

And that is where the crux of the problem lies – the iron ore mining scam that was focussed around Bellary district in north Karnataka. The taint of corruption has spread deep and far into the party’s ranks and Siroya is correct when he argues that Advani and Swaraj cannot feign ignorance about what has happened.

As he points out in his letter to Advani: “The negotiations to end the impasse were held not in the party office, but at your residence. The entire nation watched the reborn ‘Ironman of India’ succumb before the mining mafia, who ran an illegal and immoral empire in the state. Can I ever describe to you (how) the people of Karnataka hung their head(s) in shame that day? Didn’t that look like ‘corruption’ or ‘compromise’ to you?”

To understand the “negotiations” that Siroya is referring to, one has to take a short trip back in time. In November 2009, after Yeddyurappa decided to ask for a “contribution” of Rs 1,000 from the owners of each truck carrying iron ore out of Bellary for those affected by floods in the state a month earlier, the mining barons of the state led by Gali Janardhana Reddy, former Minister for Tourism, Youth Affairs and Infrastructure Development in Yeddyurappa’s government, displayed their awesome clout by precipitating a political crisis that threatened the continuance of the state government.

PTI

PTI

The crisis was resolved only after the BJP leadership in New Delhi, in particular, Sushma Swaraj, intervened. Siroya pointed out that “at one stroke” as many as 64 senior officers belonging to the Indian Administrative Service, the Indian Police Service and the Indian Forest Service, were reinstated on that occasion at the instance of the Gali Reddy brothers and that this was touted as a “birthday gift” for Advani — the senior leader of the BJP was born on 8 November 1927. (Incidentally, Siroya pointed out that some of these officers are currently behind bars.)

Yeddyurappa was publicly reduced to tears on one occasion. And he had to ask his confidante Shobha Karandlaje to temporarily “sacrifice” her ministerial position to appease the Gali Reddy brothers, who control Obulapuram Mining Company (OMC) based in neighbouring Andhra Pradesh.

It is hardly a secret that the “Bellary brothers” and their associates provided considerable financial support for the BJP’s election victory in Karnataka in May 2008. Siroya’s letter states, though in not so many words, that the first BJP government in southern India was born in sin since it had to “buy” the support of a number of independent legislators to obtain a majority in the assembly, in an operation that was code-named Operation Kamal.

Not only that, as senior journalist Sugata Srinivasaraju points out, there was a “rape of democracy” when a number of MLAs belong to the Congress and Janata Dal (Secular) were “persuaded” to resign and re-contest elections on BJP tickets a few months later. Surely the BJP’s big guns in Delhi were not unaware of what had taken place.

The Gali Reddy brothers were subsequently indicted by the Lokayukta, as well as by the Supreme Court of India-appointed Central Empowered Committee, for trespassing state boundaries and violating forest laws during mining operations.

In June 2009, the Gali Reddy brothers spent over Rs 40 crore gifting a diamond-studded crown to the Tirupathi temple. It had earlier been alleged that persons close to Janardhana Reddy were responsible for the destruction of the 200-year-old Sugalamma Devi temple located in the mining lease area of OMC in destroying another temple because it came in the way of their illegal mining activities. In September 2006, a case against the Reddy brothers was dropped despite objections from the police and the law department in the state.

Now all this should have bad news for a party that professes to believe in the virtues of Hindutva. But no, the Gali Reddy brothers were at that stage “untouchable”.

On 9 July 2010, the Karnataka High Court issued an interim order directing the customs authorities to stop all exports of iron ore by 10 private companies from the ports of Mangalore, Karwar and Belekeri in the state, till an investigation was completed into the disappearance of 500,000 tonnes of iron ore – out of the 700,000 tonnes of ore that were seized in March 2010 at the instance of Lokayukta Justice Hegde. The ore was transported to the Belekeri port in an allegedly unauthorised manner. Ministers in the Karnataka state government offered unconvincing reasons for the disappearance of the iron ore.

A fortnight earlier, fed up with the inaction of the state government and angered that those who had seized illegally mined iron ore at his behest were being victimised, Justice Hegde decided to resign on 23 June 2010. However, on 3 July 2010, following the advice of senior BJP leader Advani, who he described as a “father figure”, the then Lokayukta withdrew his resignation letter.

As Firstpost reported: “On 16 July 2010, the then Chief Minister of Karnataka, BS Yeddyurappa, acknowledged in the state assembly that over 30 million tonnes of iron ore had been illegally exported from Karnataka over a seven-year period between April 2003 and March 2010. The total worth of this huge quantity of iron ore would be at least $1.5 billion, or Rs 7,500 crore (assuming very conservatively that each tonne of iron ore was worth $50 in the international market). The then Chief Minister contended that out of the 30 million tonnes illegally exported, only around 10.5 million tonnes of iron ore had been illegally exported out of the state during the first two years of his term.”

It is hardly a secret that the "Bellary brothers" and their associates provided considerable financial support for the BJP’s election victory in Karnataka in May 2008. Reuters

It is hardly a secret that the “Bellary brothers” and their associates provided considerable financial support for the BJP’s election victory in Karnataka in May 2008. Reuters

By early-2011, it had become quite apparent that Yeddyurappa’s days as chief minister were numbered. On 27 July 2011, a few days before he retired, Lokayukta Justice Hegde presented his final report on illegal mining in Bellary which raised a political storm, not just in the state but in the entire country. The detailed document indicted Janardhana Reddy and refuted his contention that he was not involved in illegal mining in the state. It also alleged that he had laundered money through international tax havens.

More importantly, Justice Hegde’s voluminous report was scathing in its criticism of Yeddyurappa’s personal role, meticulously documenting how his family members received kickbacks from mining companies and how rules were tailored to enable them to acquire large tracts of land and properties.

Even before this report had been submitted, a section of the BJP top brass had begun distancing themselves from the Bellary mafia. Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj, who had been close to the Gali Reddy brothers from the time she contested Parliamentary elections from Bellary against Sonia Gandhi in 1999, in an interview toOutlook weekly (6 June 2011), sought to distance herself from the Gali Reddy brothers and claimed that their rise was on account of their proximity to Yeddyurappa and the support given to them by Arun Jaitley, Swaraj’s counterpart in the Rajya Sabha, perceived by some to be her rival in the party.

Even earlier that year, Siroya pointed out, a delegation of ten senior leaders of the BJP from Karnataka had met Advani at his residence in New Delhi and complained about Yeddyurappa turning a blind eye to the activities of the mining mafia in the state. Among these leaders were two who went on to become chief ministers of the state ((Jagdish Shettar and Sadananda Gowda) and one who became state party president (Prahlad Joshi), Siroya added, though he does not name the concerned individuals.

After a lot of kicking and screaming, on 31 July 2011, Yeddyurappa had to put in his papers. Just over a month later, on 5 September, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) arrested Gali Janardhana Reddy and  his brother-in-law BV Sreenivas Reddy, managing director of Obulapuram Mining Company. The arrests came almost 21 months after a first information report against the company had been lodged by the CBI in December 2009.

To return to Lehar Singh Siroya’s 13 May letter to Advani, what has rankled the BJP leadership is that the suspended treasurer of the party’s Karnataka unit has not stopped at pointing out that both Advani and Swaraj had turned a blind eye to all that Yeddyurappa and Janardhana Reddy were doing.

He stated that the BJP in Karnataka had not been cleansed of corrupt elements after Yeddyurappa’s departure and that many “tainted” MLAs who had been given tickets went on to lose elections. He told Advani that he had sat next to some of these “tainted” legislators when he campaigned.

Suspended treasurer Siroya’s criticism of Advani and the top leadership of the BJP went beyond Karnataka. He said that Advani had endorsed the BJP’s support to Rajya Sabha MP and failed industrialist Vijay Mallya as well as to former Jharkhand Chief Minister Shibu Soren and non-resident Indian businessman Anshuman Mishra who unsuccessfully tried to get elected to the Rajya Sabha from Jharkhand.

In short, Siroya has accused the top brass of India’s biggest opposition political party of hypocrisy and worse.

Posted in BJP, corruption India, Crimes India, Karnataka | Leave a comment

Fallacy of political tourism in Pak — Subramanian Swamy

FALLACY OF POLITICAL TOURISM IN PAK
Saturday, 18 May 2013 | Pioneer | in Oped

A lot of Indians are justifiably cheered by Nawaz Sharif’s return to power through an election which saw ordinary Pakistanis defy the Mullahs. But helping this new order with compromises on Kashmir and national identity would be a grave mistake

The problem with Indo-Pakistan relation is the deep rooted malaise in the mindset on both sides of theborder that cannot be ‘cured’ by merely increasing the exchange of heads of government visits or by stepping up the volumes of bilateral trade, or through the facilitation of dance&drama delegations, or of cricket tours. There must be concrete actions based on deep analysis of the malaise which could, sometime in the future, lead to cure.

Dr BR Ambedkar wrote in his Pakistan, Or Partition of India (New Delhi, 1975): The problem of Pakistan has given a headache to everyone, more so to me than to anybody else. I cannot help recalling with regret how much of my time it has consumed when so much of my other work of greater importance to me than this is held up for want of it. I therefore hope that this second edition will also be the last I trust that before it is exhausted either the question will be settled or withdrawn.

Fresh paradigm What is required is a mindset change. Pakistan may be technically a democracy, but is on the brink of Talibanisation. According to my information, the two largest parties, freshly re-elected Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s PML and Imran Khan’s PTI, are both controlled by Jamait E Islami, ISI and Taliban-compliant forces. Both leaders, in their desperation quest of power, sold their souls to them.

We in India have thus to fight this new Pakistani mindset of capitulation to Islamic fundamentalist forces, which forces have every intention to intrude into India to radicalise Indian Muslims. That means patriotic Indians would also need to simultaneously prepare for war while sweating for peace.

The first step we need to take is rectify the lack of a clear national identity at our end and build a more cohesive India. Without a conscious common acceptance of a national identity especially by Hindus and Muslims, we cannot effectively deal with this new Pakistan.

Let us not forget that from day one Pakistan has posed a serious existential problem for India, which is: Are we or are we not,Hindus and Muslims living in India, one nation? Pakistani mind is clear: Muslims constitute a separate nation.For Pakistan, Hindus and Muslims are two nations, and can never be one.

Because of the legacy of a woozy Nehru we have failed so far to find a basis for defining India’s identity that includes Hindus and other religious communities.

In the words of Dr Ambedkar: What the Hindus must show is that notwithstanding some differences, there are enough affinities between Hindus and Musalmans to constitute them into one nation, or, to use plain language, which make Muslims and Hindus long to belong together.

It is my view (supported by modern scientific study of genetics of Indians based on DNA research) Hindus and Muslims can develop heartfelt affinity only if Muslims accept publicly and with pride the truth and the scientific fact: that the ancestors of Muslims are Hindus. This is what genetic research reveals.

Such open acceptance by Muslims in India of a common ancestry could lead to both Hindus and Muslims regarding themselves as equal legatees of a continuing civilisation. Our national identity thus is: India is a land of Hindus and of those whose ancestors are Hindus.

In private many Muslims and Hindus do accept this fact, but in public they shy away from owning up this implied affinity for fear of the militant and jehadi sections which are likely place a reward on their head. The Mullah thinks that this acceptance and consequent affinity could lead to Muslims accepting Hindutva (Hinduness).

Distancing After 1857, a prominent Delhi Muslim cleric fearing being swallowed culturally by Hindus by proximity began propagating the “concept of distance” between Muslims and Hindus. This concept got mainstreamed among Muslim intellectuals and eventually to Pakistan. The Mullah today again thinks that insulating the Muslim in India is the only way to keep the community intact from dissolving under the quicksand of Hindutva.

Pakistan aids this effort by clandestinely canvassing the view that Muslims of India have descended from Ghori and Ghazni, and not from Hindus, thereby clouding the truth of our genetic affinity.

The Mullahs, with the backing of official Pakistan, urge the Muslims of India to be internationally oriented to the ummah. They ask Indian Muslims to support Islamic causes even if such support clashes with India’s national interests. Therefore a ‘business as usual’ policy toward Pakistan can only drive deeper the wedge in perceptions between Hindus and Muslims of each other in India. India’s attitude to Pakistan thus has got to recognise that cosmetic changes and political tourism will be so much water off a duck’s back since for Pakistan, its national security lies in ensuring that Hindus and Muslim affinity is poisoned and buried.

Therefore, before we in India have firewall ourselves against Pakistan’s insidious campaign or else each forward move would expose us to the danger of Hindu-Muslim alienation at home. If we look backwards, our relations with Pakistan has barely improved over the last 66 years, but the Muslim “internationalist conclave mindset” has become entrenched. Vote bank politics has worsened this trend.

Eternal conflict

Prophet Mohammed has decreed in Sira and Hadith, the holy texts the Sunnis accept as Allah’s hukum, that where Muslims are not constituted as a nation, (Dar ul Harb), they ought to strive for Dar ul Islam through all means possible.

That is why 500,000 Kashmiri Hindus and Sikhs were driven out of the Kashmir Valley. It made no sense to drive out a totally non-violent community as the Kashmiri Pandits were except on the basis of the Prophet’s decree of converting Dar ul Harab into Dar ul Islam. Thus, the Mullahs in Srinagar declared: Kashmir must become a Caliphate.

We cannot accept any compromise on Kashmir because that will undo the concept of our national identity. We must resolve therefore that any peace with Pakistan can be only after the entire Kashmir including PoK is fully integrated with India under the Constitution. Relations with Pakistan should be put on a hold till then. In any case if India declines to discuss Kashmir, Pakistan will not want to normalise relations or even talk with India in the new dispensation in Islamabad.

The Taliban has in its publications called India the “unfinished chapter” of Islamic history. This exhibits the mindset of the Islamic hardliners who are increasing every day in numbers. In 2014, the US is likely to pull out from Afghanistan after an agreement with the Taliban that is presently being hammered out in Qatar. Thereafter, unless India or China or both intervene, Afghanistan will go under Taliban rule. Hence, talking with Pakistan on our core issues of concern such as handing over 26/11 terrorists charged with the crime, closing down terrorist training camps, stopping infiltration across LoC will not be addressed by a Talibanised Pakistan. Instead we have to prepare to meet the new situation to defend India’s integrity and security.

In other words, the bottom line in the current situation is that instead to extending the hand of friendship to the newly elected government which is a surrogate for the invisible government of Taliban, India should prepare for war while expressing readiness for an honourable peace.

Subramanian Swamy (The writer is a former union minister and president, Janata Party)

http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/oped/fallacy-of-political-tourism-in-pak.html#

Posted 30 minutes ago by 
Posted in Anti-national Congress Party, appeasing the Muslims, BJP, secularist terrorism, The farce of Indian Secularism | Leave a comment

The ‘incestuous relationship’ between Congress and media – Firstpost

by FP Staff May 17, 2013

At the height of the drama last week over the resignation of Law Minister Ashwani Kumar and Railway Minister Pawan Kumar Bansal, the media was abuzz with reports, evidently planted by sections within the Congress, suggesting that the credit for the resignations ought to go to Congress president Sonia Gandhi.
According to these narratives, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was reluctant to let go of these ministers, and it needed Sonia Gandhi to exert her considerable political influence and dislodge the ministers who were proving a political liability to the Congress.
Many of these media reports were attributed to unidentified “sources” in the Congress, although a parallel, and much tamer, narrative was being trotted out by the official party spokeperson.
Reuters

The media gets, well, a bad press from time to time – and often times gets derivisely dismissed as “Paid Media”.
Some of these “source-based” reports went to bizarre lengths to weave conspiracy theories about the gongs-on in the Congress. One of the strands, which found much resonance in the mainstream media, was that it was in fact Mamnohan Singh’s wife Gursharan Kaur, who was acting on behalf of her politically meek husband and pushing for the retention of Ashwani Kumar and Bansal in the Ministry.
In this narrative, the so-called “Kaur group”, led by the Prime Minister’s wife, was taking on the “core group” within the Congress that owed its political allegiance to Sonia Gandhi. The suggestion that Gursharan Kaur, who has been scrupulous about avoiding the public space, would engage so blatantly in politicking on her husband’s behalf is laughable, of course, but it didn’t prevent the media from amplifying it.
Writing in Open magazine, Hartosh Singh Bal expresses wonderment that “an amiable woman who we rarely see in public” and who has been considered apolitical for much of the time that Manmohan Singh has been Prime Minister had been “suddenly transferred into the head of a group more powerful than Opus Dei.”
But the story gained legs largely because it was being pushed by a powerful corporate group, and was being amplified by journalists who are considered close to Finance Minister P Chidambaram, notes Bal.
In Bal’s reasoning, the fact that such conspiracy theories were being pushed out – and being taken seriously by the media – is the symptom of a malaise that afflicts the “incestuous” relationship between politicians and the media in general. And in particular, between second-rung Congress leaders and a pliant media.
The media gets, well, a bad press from time to time – and often times gets derivisely dismissed as “Paid Media”. Bal points to an ecosystem that blurs the lines of propriety that is disquieting.
“As far as some media organisations such as NDTV and Tehelka are concerned, their closeness to the Congress is no secret,” he writes. “Barkha Dutt’s role in the Radia Tapes did not seem to point to an individual act, but an institutional malaise.” That malaise manifests itself in other ways, as for instance when Sanjay Jha, who appears frequently on behalf of the Congres on television talk shows, holds workshops at NDTV (in his capacity as Executive Director of Dale Carnegie Training). Bal points out that in effect Jha holds these workshops for those very people who could be asking him questions on a prime-time evening show.
What happens at the level of individual reporters is even more incestuous, he adds. “Access (to power) requires give-and-take, and several reporters have developed an unhealthy proximity to a number of Congress leaders. In the durbar politics of the party, where it is necessary to strike down potential competitors, the media has played a vital role,” he reasons.
When the Radia Tapes scandal blew up in 2010, this incestuous relationship between politicians and journalists – and the clever manipulation of that relationship by corporate lobbyists – was comprehensively exposed. As Siddharth Varadarajan noted at that time, “…we see journalists and editors, who are meant to report and analyse what is going on objectively, offering to become couriers and stenographers and foot soldiers in the war one set of corporate fat cats is waging against another.”
The journalists who were liaising with Radia, he argued then, should have exposed her role (and the role of her principal clients) in trying to push for A Raja, who was seen even then as tainted, as Telecom Minister. Instead, they used her as a “source” for covering the DMK – and became complicit in Radia’s agenda by carrying messages to the Congress.
“But then,” wrote Varadarajan then, “Delhi is a hothouse of power, and proximity to power deadens one’s reflexes and weakens one’s nerves.” What Indian journalism needs, he added, more than anything else today is distance – from both politicians and industrialists.
Even three years later, it appears, that lesson has not been learnt.
Read Hartosh Singh Bal’s essay in Open magazine here, and Siddharth Varadarajan’s searing op-ed from 2010 here.
Posted in Anti Hindu Secular Media in India, Anti-national Congress Party, corruption India, Crimes India, Perverted secular media, Secularist terrorism in India, Sonia and Mafia | Leave a comment