Romila Thapar’s mask of obfuscation torn open by Dr.Subramanian Swamy (2004)

This happened in 2004

Here is what Romila Thapar wrote in the Hindu letters to the editor http://www.hindu.com/2004/03/22/stories/2004032201661001.htm

Redefining secularism

Sir, — I am writing with reference to the article “Redefining secularism” (March 18) by Subramanian Swamy. I was rather amused to read his comments on my views of `the Aryans’, in which he accuses me of having defined Aryan and Dravidian as racial categories and now having changed my mind in accordance with the views of the RSS, since the BJP came to power.

If he had read anything on the debate among historians concerning the Aryan theory, he would have known that for the last 30 years I, together with other historians, have been refuting the concept of an Aryan race or a Dravidian race. I have stated categorically in “A History of India,” Vol. I, published in 1966, that Aryan is a linguistic term. I discussed this in greater detail in my presidential address to the Ancient Indian History Section of the Indian History Congress in Varanasi in 1968, where I argued that Aryan is a linguistic label and not a racial category. And just for the record, since I am frequently misquoted on this by some people, I argued further that although I did not accept the notion of an Aryan invasion, I did support the idea of a graduated migration of Aryan-speaking peoples from the Indo-Iranian borderlands into north-western India. This resulted in an interface of various cultures and this interface needs to be explored — and many of us have done so, as would be apparent from our other publications on the subject.

It would seem that the Subramanian Swamys of this world do not believe in reading the books of those whom they accuse of having incorrect ideas on history. They attribute theories of various kinds to whomsoever they chose. Surely this was not the training that Dr. Swamy was given at Harvard?

As for my toeing the RSS line on the Aryan theory, after the BJP having come to power, the shoe is actually on the other foot. The mentors of the RSS spoke of race and the race spirit with reference to the Aryans in the 1920s and 1930s. If the RSS has now decided, as Dr. Swamy asserts, that Aryan is a language label and not a racial category, they are stating what many of us have been saying for some decades now. As for those sympathetic to the RSS choosing to repeat what others and I had said 30 years ago — that’s their choice!

Romila Thapar,
New Delhi

And here is Dr.Swamy’s reply http://www.hindu.com/2004/03/24/stories/2004032401421001.htm

Swamy’s reply

Sir, — I write with reference to Dr. Romila Thapar’s rebuttal of my remarks (Letters, The Hindu, March 22) about her propagation of Aryan as a race in her past writings. She wonders what they taught me at Harvard. What they taught me and what I have taught at Harvard is that if you make an argument in rebuttal, do not contradict yourself in that argument. But this is what precisely Dr. Thapar has done. While denying that she ever argued that Aryan was a racial term, she goes on to say that it was the language of those who migrated to India from abroad in a “graduated” way. Who were they? Is she arguing that they were racially the same as Indians or different? And who graduated the migration? She should be explicit. Never obfuscate — Harvard teaches that too. Obviously that is not being taught at JNU. Aryan is a German version of the Sanskrit word “Arya,” which means a gentleman, while Dravida is a word coined by Adi Shankara while at Varanasi to mean a person from the south. I am ready to debate Dr. Thapar on this issue publicly.

Subramanian Swamy,
Madurai, T.N.

Advertisements

About janamejayan

A Viraat Hindu dedicated to spread the message of Paramacharya of Kanchi
This entry was posted in Dr.Subramanian Swamy, Secularist fraud on Indian History. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Romila Thapar’s mask of obfuscation torn open by Dr.Subramanian Swamy (2004)

  1. Janmejaya says:

    An excellent reply by Dr. Swamy. And yes Harvard never advocates the idea of pseudo communal and pro-Islamic doctored facts in the name of history whereas I suppose JNU certainly does the same vis-a-vis the Romila Thapar’s and the Irfan Habib’s of India.

  2. vinayakumar says:

    Why can’t the Romila Thapar’s and Irfan Habib’s take into account the new facts and findings available and do research further on these issues. Why are they insisting that their distorted views are the correct one with the support of communists and so called secularists and forced to studhy through school history books.

    • Janmejaya says:

      A simple reason could be the grander scheme of congress backed anti-Hindu propaganda run since the days of Nehru and intensified during the days of Rajiv Gandhi. Well the Congress has always depended upon the Irfan Habibs and the Romila Thapars to manipulate history to the extent of concealing the true identity of India from Indians, to deliberately undermine the fact that India is for Hindus what water is to fish. They deliberately chalked out fantasies to suppress Hindu pride in their achievements vis-a-vis the Islamic invasion of India. While Islam conquered central Asia, the middle east and north africa within a couple of decades, it performed poorly against the politically divided yet ideologically connected Hindu kingdoms and empires of India. If the Hindus were to peep into their past and derive pride and and a sense of unity and strength from it, they could easily uproot the invaders till ruling over them such as the Sonia Maino family and their Islamic sympathizers within India. Hindus are ignorant of their true heritage and military exploits and if they realize that soon, the Islamists and the Islamist appeasing govt would be crushed in India forever. Hence the need by the congress of the Irfan Habibs and Romila Thapars to maintain the mask over the majority Hindus unti Moslems attain the same demographic levels as the Hindus. A la Bangladesh in the offing!!!.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s