How to wipe out Islamic terror: Dr. Subramanian Swamy

The ‘minority’ commission is trying to use the secular law to thwart the fundamental rights of the Indian citizens in expressing their fears of  terrorist attacks by the Islamic hoards that are bent upon destroying Hindustan.  We are republishing Dr.Subramanian Swamy’s article so you can judge it yourself.  The saying is true that if one is not pro-Indian then he is anti-Indian. If one is not pro-Hindu then he is anti-Hindu.  Most secularists fall in this category.

Janamejayan

How to wipe out Islamic terror: Dr. Subramaniam Swamy
The terrorist blast in Mumbai on July 13, 2011 requires a decisive soul searching by Hindus of India. Hindus cannot accept to be killed in this Halal fashion, continuously bleeding every day, till the nation finally collapses.
Terrorism, I define here as the illegal use of force to overawe the civilian population to make it do or not do an act against their will and well-being.
There are about 40 reported and unreported terrorist attacks per month in the country. That is why the recent US National Counter-Terrorism Centre publication A Chronology of International Terrorism states: ‘India suffered more terrorist acts than any other country’.
While the PM thinks that Maoists’ threat is most serious, I think Islamic  terrorism is an even more serious existential threat. If we did not have today the present Union Home Minister, PM, and UPA chairperson, then Maoists can be eliminated in a month, much as I did with the LTTE in Tamil Nadu, as a senior minister in 1991, or MGR did with the Naxalites in the early 1980s. Islamic threat to the nation is different.
Why is Islamic terrorism our number one problem of national security? About this there will be no doubt in anyone’s mind after 2012. By that year, I expect a Taliban takeover in Pakistan and the Americans to flee Afghanistan. Then, Islam will confront Hinduism to ‘complete unfinished business’. Already the successor to Osama Bin Laden as the Al Qaeda leader has declared that India is the priority target for that terrorist organisation and not the USA.
Fanatic Muslims consider Hindu dominated India as “an unfinished chapter of Islamic conquests”. I may be recalled that all other countries conquered by Islam became 100% converted to Islam within two decades of the Islamic invasion. India is the exception. Undivided India in 1947 was 75% Hindu even after 800 years of brutal Islamic rule. That is jarring for the Islamic fanatics.
Let us remember that every Hindu-Muslim riot in India since 1947, has been ignited by Muslim fanatics — if one goes by all the Commissions of Inquiry set up after every riot. Even the Gujarat riots were triggered by the brutal killing of 56 women and children by setting fire to a rail coach in Godhra.
By today’s definition these riots are all terroristacts. Muslims, though a minority in India, still have fanatics who dare tolead violent attacks against Hindus. Other Muslims of India just lump it, sulk or rejoice. That is the history from Babar’s time to Aurangzeb. There have been exceptions to this apathy of Muslims like Dara Shikoh, in the old days, or like M J Akbar and Salman Haidar today who are not afraid to speak out against Islamic terror, but still they remain exceptions.
Blame the Hindus
In one sense, I do not blame the Muslim fanatics for targeting Hindus. I blame us Hindus who have taken their individuality permitted in Sanatana Dharma to the extreme. Millions of Hindus can assemble without state patronage for Kumbh Mela completely self-organised, but they all leave for home oblivious of the targeting of Hindus in Kashmir, Mau, Melvisharam and Malappuram and do not lift their little finger to help organise Hindus. For example, if half the Hindus vote together rising above their caste and language, a genuine Hindu party will have a two-thirds majority in Parliament and Assemblies.
The secularists now tout instances of Hindu fanatics committing terrorist  attacks against Muslims or other minorities. But these attacks are mostly state sponsored, often by the Congress itself, and not by Hindu ‘non-state actors’. Muslim-led attacks are however all by ‘non-state actors’ unless one includes the ISI and rogue elements in Pakistan’s army which are aiding them, as state sponsoring.
Fanatic Muslim attacks have been carried out to target and demoralise the Hindus, to make Hindus yield that which they should not, with the aim of undermining and ultimately to dismantle the Hindu foundation of India. This is the unfinished war of 1,000 years which Osama bin Laden talks about. In fact, the earliest terror tactics in India were deployed in Bengal 1946 by Suhrawady and Jinnah to terrorise Hindus to give in on the demand for Pakistan. The Congress party claiming to represent the Hindus capitulated, and handed 25 per cent of India on a platter to Mohammed Ali Jinnah. Now they want the remaining 75 per cent.
Forces against Hindus
This is not to say that other stooges have not targeted Hindus. During the last six decades since Independence, British imperialist-inspired Dravidian movement led by E V Ramaswamy Naicker, in the name of rationalism tried to debunk as irrational the Hindu religion, and terrorised the Hindu priestly class, ie, the Brahmins, for propagating the Hindu religion.
The movement’s organisational arm, the Dravida Kazhagam (DK), had venerated Ravana for 50 years to spite the Hindu adoration of Rama and vulgarise the abduction of Sita, till the DK belatedly learnt that Ravana was a Brahmin and a pious bhakta of Lord Shiva too. Abandoning this course of defaming Ramayana, the DK have now become stooges of the anti-Indian LTTE which has specialised in killing the Hindu Tamil leadership in Sri Lanka. Of course the DK has now been orphaned by the decimation of the LTTE.
Civil war situation
In the 1960s, the Christian missionaries had inspired the Nagas. The Nagas also wanted to further amputate Bharat Mata by seeking secession of Nagaland from the nation. In the 1980s, the Hindus of Manipur were targeted by foreign-trained elements. Manipuris were told:give up Hinduism or be killed. In Kashmir, since the beginning of the 1990s, militants in league with the Pakistan-trained terrorists also targeted the Hindus by driving the Hindu Pandits out of the Valley, or killing them ordishonouring their women folk.
Recognising that targeting of Hindus is being widely perceived, and that Muslims of India are largely just passive spectators, the foreign patrons of Islamic terrorists are beginning to engage in terrorist acts that could pit Muslims against Hindus in nation-wide conflagration and possible civil war as in Serbia and Bosnia.
Muslims cannot be divided into ‘moderates’ and ‘extremists’ because the former just capitulate when confronted. Recently, Pakistan civilian government capitulated on ‘kite flying’ and banned it because Taliban considers it as ‘Hindu’. Moderate governments of Malaysia and Kazhakstan are now demolishing Hindu temples.
Collective response
Hence, the first lesson to be learnt from recent history of Islamic terrorism against India, and for tackling terrorism in India is that the Hindu is the target and that Muslims of India are being programmed by a slow reactive process to become radical and thus slide into suicide against Hindus. It is to undermine the Hindu psyche and create fear of civil war that terror attacks are organised.
 And hence since the Hindu is the target, Hindus must collectively respond as Hindus against the terrorist and not feel individually isolated or worse, be complacent because he or she is not personally affected. If one Hindu dies merely because he or she was a Hindu, then a bit of every Hindu also dies. This is an essential mental attitude, a necessary part of a virat Hindu (for  fuller discussion of the concept of virat Hindu, see my Hindus Under Siege: The Way Out Haranand, 2006).
Therefore we need today a collective mindset as Hindus to stand against the Islamic terrorist. In this response, Muslims of India can join us if they genuinely feel for the Hindu. That they do, I will not believe, unless they acknowledge with pride that though they may be Muslims, their ancestors are Hindus.
It is not easy for them to acknowledge this ancestry because the Muslim mullah would consider it as unacceptable since that realisation would dilute the religious fervour in their faith and also create an option for their possible re-conversion to Hinduism. Hence, these religious leaders preach hatred and violence against the kafir i.e, the Hindu (for example read Chapter 8 verse 12 of the Quran) to keep the faith of their followers. The Islamic terrorist outfits, e.g the SIMI, has already resolved that India is Darul Harab, and they are committed to make it Darul  Islam. That makes them free of any moral compunction whatsoever in dealing with Hindus.
Brihad Hindu Samaj
But still, if any Muslim does so acknowledge his or her Hindu legacy, then we Hindus can accept him or her as a part of the Brihad Hindu Samaj, which is Hindustan. India that is Bharat that is Hindustan is a nation of Hindus and others whose ancestors are Hindus. Even Parsis and Jews in India have Hindu ancestors. Others, who refuse to so acknowledge or those foreigners who become Indian citizens by registration can remain in India, but should not have voting rights (which means they cannot be elected representatives).
Hence, to begin with, any policy to combat terrorism must begin with requiring each and every Hindu becoming a committed or virat Hindu. To be a virat Hindu one must have a Hindu mindset, a mindset that recognises that  there is vyaktigat charitra (personal character) and a rashtriya charitra (national character).
It is not enough if one is pious, honest and educated. That is the personal character only. National character is a mindset actively and vigorously committed to the sanctity and integrity of the nation. For example, Manmohan Singh, our prime minister, has high personal character (vyaktigat charitra),  but by being a rubber stamp of a semi-literate Sonia Gandhi, and waffling on all national issues, he has proved that he has no rashtriya charitra.
The second lesson for combating the terrorism we face today is: since demoralising the Hindu and undermining the Hindu foundation of India in order to destroy the Hindu civilisation, is the goal of all terrorists in India we must never capitulate and never concede any demand of the terrorists. The basic policy has to be: never yield to any demand of the terrorists. That necessary resolve has not been shown in our recent history. Instead ever since we conceded Pakistan in 1947 under duress, we have been mostly yielding time and again.
Bowing to terrorists
In 1989, to obtain the release of Mufti Mohammed Sayeed’s daughter, Rubaiyya who had been kidnapped by terrorists, five terrorists in Indian jails were set free by the V P Singh’s government. This made these criminals in the eyes of Kashmiri separatists and fence sitters heroes, as those who had brought India’s Hindu establishment on its knees. To save Rubaiyya it was not necessary to surrender to terrorist demands.
A worse capitulation to terrorists in our modern history was in the Indian Airlines IC-814 hijack in December 1999 staged in Kandahar. The government released three terrorists even without getting court permission (required since they were in judicial custody). Moreover, they were escorted by a senior minister on the PM’s special Boeing all the way to Kandahar as royal guests instead of being shoved across the Indo-Pakistan border.
Worse still, all the three after being freed, went back to Pakistan and created three separate terrorist organisations to kill Hindus. Mohammed Azhar, whom the National Security Advisor Brijesh Mishra had then described as “a mere harmless cleric”, upon his release led the LeT to savage and repeated terrorist attacks on Hindus all over India from Bangalore to Srinagar. Since mid-2000, Azhar is responsible for the killing of over 2,000 Hindus and the attack on Parliament on December 13, 2001. Omar Sheikh who helped al-Qaeda is in jail in US custody for killing US journalist Daniel Pearl, while the third, Zargar is engaged today in random killings of Hindus in Doda and Jammu after founding Al-Mujahideen Jingaan.
This Kandahar episode proves that we should never negotiate with terrorists, never yield. If you do, then sooner or later you will end up losing more lives than you will ever save by a deal with terrorists.
Moment of truth
The third lesson to be learnt is that whatever and however small the terrorist incident, the nation must retaliate—not by measured and ‘sober’ responses but by massive retaliation.  Otherwise what is the alternative? Walk meekly to death expecting that our ‘sober’ responses will be rewarded by our neighbours and their patrons? We will be back to 1100 AD fooled into suicidal credulity. We should not be ghouls for punishment from terrorists and their patrons. We should retaliate.
For example, when Ayodhya temple was sought to be attacked,  this was not a big terrorist incident but we should have massively retaliated by re-building the Ram temple at the site.
This is Kaliyug, and hence there is no room for sattvic responses to evil people. Hindu religion has a concept of apat dharma and we should invoke it. This is the moment of truth for us. Either we organise to survive as a civilisation or vanish as the Persian, Babylonian, and Egyptian civilisations did centuries ago before the brutal Islamic onslaught. For  that our motto should be Saam, Dhaam, Bheda, Danda.

Poverty is no factor
What motivates the Islamic terrorists in India? Many are advising us Hindus to deal with the root ‘cause’ of terrorism rather than concentrate on eradicating terrorists by retaliation. And pray what is the root ‘cause’?
 According to bleeding heart liberals, terrorists are born or bred because of illiteracy, poverty, oppression, and discrimination. They argue that instead of eliminating them, the root cause of these four disabilities in society should be removed. Only then terrorism will disappear. Before replying to this, let us understand that I have serious doubts about the integrity of these liberals, or more appropriately, these promiscuous intellectuals. They seek to deaden the emotive power of the individual and render him passive (inculcate ‘majboori’ in our psyche). A nation state cannot survive for long with such a capitulationist mentality.
It is rubbish to say that terrorists who mastermind the attacks are poor. Osama bin laden for example is a billionaire. Islamic terrorists are patronised by those states that have grown rich from oil revenues. In Britain, the terrorists arrested so far for the bombings are all well-to-do persons. Nor are terrorists uneducated. Most of terrorist leaders are doctors, chartered accountants, MBAs and teachers. For example, in the failed Times Square New York episode, the Islamic terrorist Shahzad studied and got an MBA from a reputed US university. He was from a highly placed family in Pakistan. He certainly faced no discrimination and oppression in his own country. The gang of nine persons who hijacked four planes on September 11, 2001 and flew them into the World Trade Towers in New York and other targets were certainly not discriminated or oppressed in the United States. Hence it is utter rubbish to say that terror is the outcome of the poverty terrorists face.
If we accept the Left-wing liberals argument, does it mean that in Islamic countries, the non-Islamic religious minority who are discriminated and oppressed can take to terrorism? In the Valley, where Muslims are in majority, not only Article 370 of the Constitution provides privileges to the majority but it is the minority Hindus who have been slaughtered, or raped, and dispossessed. They have become refugees in squalid conditions in  their own country.
It is also a ridiculous idea that terrorists cannot be deterred because they are irrational, willing to die, and have no ‘return address’. Terrorist masterminds have political goals and a method in their madness. An effective strategy to deter terrorism is therefore to defeat those political goals and to rubbish them by counter-terrorist action. How is that strategy to be structured? In a brilliant research paper published by Robert Trager and Dessislava Zagorcheva this year (‘Deterring Terrorism’ International Security, vol 30, No 3, Winter 2005/06, pp 87-123) has provided the general principles to structure such a strategy.
Goal-strategy
Applying these principles, I advocate the following strategy to negate the political goals of Islamic terrorism in India, provided  the Muslim community fail to condemn these goals and call them un-Islamic:
Goal 1: Overawe India on Kashmir.
Strategy: Remove Article 370, and re-settle ex-servicemen in the Valley. Create Panun Kashmir for Hindu Pandit community. Look or create opportunity to take over PoK. If Pakistan continues to back terrorists, assist the Baluchis and Sindhis to struggle for independence.

Goal 2: Blast our temples and kill Hindu devotees.
Strategy: Remove the masjid in Kashi Vishwanath temple complex, and 300 others in other sites as a tit-for-tat.
Goal 3: Make India into Darul Islam.
Strategy: Implement Uniform Civil Code, make Sanskrit learning compulsory and singing of Vande Mataram mandatory, and declare India as Hindu Rashtra in which only those non-Hindus can vote if they proudly acknowledge that their ancestors are Hindus. Re-name India as Hindustan as a nation of Hindus and those whose ancestors are Hindus.
Goal 4: Change India’s demography by illegal immigration, conversion, and refusal to adopt family planning.
Strategy: Enact a national law prohibiting conversion from Hindu religion to any other religion. Re-conversion will not be banned. Declare caste is not birth-based but code of discipline based. Welcome non-Hindus to re-convert to the caste of their choice provided they adhere to the code of discipline.  Annex land from Bangladesh in proportion to the illegal migrants from that country staying in India. At present, northern one-third from Sylhet to Khulna can be annexed to re-settle the illegal migrants.
Goal 5: Denigrate Hinduism through vulgar writings and preaching in mosques, madrassas, and churches to create loss of self-respect amongst Hindus and make them fit for capitulation.
Strategy: Propagate the development of a Hindu mindset (see my new book Hindutva and National Renaissance, Haranand, 2010).
India can solve its terrorist problem within five years by such a deterrent strategy, but for that we have to learn the four lessons outlined above, and have a Hindu mindset to take bold, risky, and hard decisions to defend the nation. If the Jews can be transformed from lambs walking meekly to the gas chambers to fiery lions in just 10 years, it is not difficult for Hindus in much better circumstances (after all we are 83 per cent of India), to do so in five years.
Guru Gobind Singh has shown us the way already, how just five fearless persons under spiritual guidance can transform a society. Even if half the Hindu voters are persuaded to collectively vote as Hindus, and for a party sincerely committed to a Hindu agenda, then we can forge an instrument for change. And that ultimately is the bottom line in the strategy to deter terrorism in a democratic Hindustan at this moment of truth.

About the author:
 Subramanian Swamy* Janata Party President is a Professor of Economics and a former Union Cabinet Minister*
About these ads

About janamejayan

A Viraat Hindu dedicated to spread the message of Paramacharya of Kanchi and his political disciple Dr.Subramanian Swamy
This entry was posted in Dr.Subramanian Swamy, Islamic Terrorism, Press Releases. Bookmark the permalink.

56 Responses to How to wipe out Islamic terror: Dr. Subramanian Swamy

  1. rahul says:

    anything which is according to strong facts…is always right….may be it blunt..or opposive to some community or especially against the votebank political parties…but every body know that truth has a ba d taste and it always hurts when it comes to you…but truth is always above all the things……..

  2. kaps says:

    Hindu and hum; Vatan hai, Hindustan hamara. Agar Ab nahi ute hum, barbad hoga gulistan hamara.

    Jai Hind

  3. thanapal says:

    It is the best and succinct article i have ever come across.Note that,Prof.Subramanium Swamy your article will be used by pseudo-secularists(read congress party) to club you to get some more votes from Muslims.
    Muslims themselves know they can do any anti-government activity and get away .
    You ,be ready for severe criticism from people who want to show one-upmanship.
    I think our Arundhathi roy will be the first one to start triade aginst you.
    Kudos to your guts.

  4. sampath says:

    very few people speak the truth. hats off to dr.subramanya swami ….

  5. vaidya k iyer says:

    To do first we must uproot, PC, SIBAL, DS, MOILY AND MUKHERJEE, with whose support Munni is looting the nation. Rajiv who wanted to be true Indian with his school oath that all Indians are my brothers and sisters, married this foreign randy and spoiled the nation

    • Xavier Kapela says:

      It is not the ‘Randy’ who spoiled the nation. It is the spineless, gutless, everything-less Congress Party which promoted this bitch to power.

  6. a t shankaran says:

    kudos to Dr.Subramaniam Swamy for a wonderful & wel researched article. In India, foolishly, majority (in the world) community is portrayed as minority (in India). Whereas Brahmins, who actually are in minority / miniscule are perceived as majority.

  7. Krish says:

    Your courage is amazing, Dr.Swamy. You’ve brought out the bitter truth which most Indians dare not talk about. Raw courage is the first & foremost need of the hour to deal with this crisis facing Hindustan. I’m sure mother Shakthi will bless Hindustan with that courage.
    Hats off to you, Dr.Swamy. May your ilk flourish.
    Krish

  8. dominic dsouza says:

    sir, yr article is fit for gutter politics. how you readily took the name of mrs GANDHI ,our prime minister and the congress,but not once of right party the BJP.YOU n many of your comrade should retire.And not indule in tearing the fabrics of modern INDIA (NOT HINDUSTAN).
    JAI INDIA.
    dominic

  9. Farooq Abbas says:

    If Dr Swamy thinks that he is doing India and Hinduism a service, I wish him a happy stay in the fools’ paradise.
    The truth is that Muslims have ruled India for centuries and they ruled fairly and justly, off course there were exceptions. If it were not so, and if the Muslims had ruled India as the RSS and Swamy would like us to believe, then by now there would have been NO HINDU!
    Just look around. Englishmen invaded Maori-land (New Zealand) and Aborigines land (Australia); and ever since, then, the original inhabitants have been condemned to live a life of II nd class citizens. It was only after 1950 and 60 that they were enfranchised!
    Think of the original tribes of what is now the US, the original tribes are only found in fairy tales, do you wonder why & How? The English colonialists announced a reward of One Dollar (Colonial scrip) for any one who would bring one red Indian skull.
    What happened to the great civilisations of the South America, the Incas, Aztecs and the Mayans? The Conquerors from Spain and Portugal repeated there what Englishmen did elsewhere. This is what the Aryans did to the Dravidians, which is why one does not see even a remnant of the beautiful South Indian temples anywhere in the Aryan Hindi belt!
    This is what victors have done everywhere, the only exception- well Muslims.
    Wake Up.

    • zakir says:

      Farooq, with your definition Brits were the most just and fair rulers!!! The fact is simple if you dont stand up against what is going wrong you are wrong as well!!

      • Anti-Islam-Terrorist says:

        Farooq,

        Every land that muslims conquered, they eliminated the existing culture eg: Persians, Babylonians etc, as pointed out by Dr. Swamy. So, it is not the muslim rules of India but the resilient Hindus that take the credit for preserving an wonderful culture. As a muslim yourself, I understand it is hard for you to accept these facts, but try looking at them with a less biased view. As a devout muslim you may have read the Quran many times. So, I do not have to tell you about Islam’s view of Kafirs and if you agree with that, there is no point for me to have a rational discussion with you. As you muslim you may rationalize it in anyway you want but the fact that such views exist in Islam and the fact that such views are being implemented by a large number of islamist-terrorists, and more importantly, the fact that every muslim gives a silent acknowledgement to it does invoke fear in a non-muslim ( a Kafir as you would put it ) like me. “Superiority of islam and conversion or execution of kafirs” has an exact parallel in history with the Nazis in Hitlers-Germany. A quote in that context comes to mind: “When they came for the communists I kept quite because I was not a communist. When the came for the homosexuals I kept quite because I was not a homosexual. When they came for the Gypsies, I kept quite because I was not a Gypsie. When they came for me, there was no one left to help me.”. It is evident that the muslims are coming for me and I shall not keep quite.

    • zahir says:

      You need a serious lesson in history. The fair ruling by Muslims was indeed an exception. and i agree with you Dude wake up and get your facts straight. Its time you wake up to what is wrong and stand against it. The article no doubt is not much accept create controversy and that is probably what it intends as well.

    • Farooq, As a Christian, am I even allowed to step one foot into mecca? Why not? Or, you as a muslim, can you change your mind and convert to Hindu? Why not? Well, many of us who have learned about your ways, now know the truth (no taqqiya here), that your dominating cult of death has always been a cesspool. What other founder of a religion required an army to spread the word? Right, none!

      Muzzy, don’t go away mad, just go away!

    • iceburrg says:

      no way have you thought about what you have said.
      historically, muslims have eliminated all
      opposition to their occupation of “lands”.
      ALL opposition. elimination of temples, entire valleys of peoples.
      oppressive interpretation of sura in order to further justify
      the inherent insanity of islam.
      if muslims had ruled anything without fear, it doesnt show.
      to equivocate ANY past terrorist events with today’s, is foolish and
      insulting.
      one cannot justify current assholiness by saying,
      “you did it too!”
      islamophobia is real.
      a phobia is an unrealistic fear of an event or thing.
      fear of islam doesnt seem unrealistic given that there have been
      NO hindu or christian or jewish suicide bombers!
      btw, why did god need a rest after ‘all that work’?

  10. BRAHMASTRA says:

    Dr.Subramanian Swamy’s article might have sounded harsh, but has, surprisingly, struck a positive chord with many Indian Muslims, proportionately more than it has with Hindus. The reason being, one point made in the article talks of Indian Muslims re-affirming the fact that their forefathers were Hindus. Incidentally, about 99% of India’s Muslim population strongly affirm that their forefathers were indeed Hindus, who were converted to Islam by force. Very few had converted voluntarily. But after being converted, they were not allowed to re-convert, even from amongst members of their family. This caused a degree of alienation. But, though they are now staunch Muslims insofar as religion is concerned, they still value their ancestry. Many a Muslim in the sub-continent, goes out of the way to assert his cultural roots, when he is in the Middle-East. This is as much true of Indian Muslims as it is of Pakistani Muslims. In fact, as everyone is aware, Pakistan had been since its inception, divided against itself on various fronts. One of the “invisible” area of demarcation, is the sidelining of those sections of Muslims, who are not considered as originating from the sub-continent. Even though more than 90% of the Pakistanis are of Indian origin, there are sections whose forefathers had been from Central/ West Asia. The Pakistani State’s approach had been from its inception, to isolate these communities. In fact, these communities feel safer when they are in India. The Lashkar, a notorious jihadi terror group of Pakistan does not allow people of “non-Indian”origin, to join its ranks. Such fault-lines are there in Afghanistan also. The notorious Taliban for example, has made it clear that its membership is only for Pashtuns in Afghanistan, who are the majority and of Indian origin. The Taliban is out of bounds for those Afghans who are of Uzbek, Tajik, Persian or Turkmen ethnicity, even though these people have also been in Afghanistan for generations.

  11. yogachari says:

    mr swamy… you need to have your head examined by a competent doctor.. does not matter hindu, or muslim or christian or parsi !

  12. Ramchandra says:

    Sir,
    Your article, I am sure has touched the millions of Hindu hearts and also those non -Hindus who are nationalist and patriotic. It is time to call the bluff of fanatic Muslims, left liberals, pseudo secularists and anti India forces. In modern times television plays a major role in opinion making and influencing the mind set. I wonder as to why nearly all Indian news channels show a very cowardice attitude towards Islamic fanaticism and squirm even at the mention of it. The muslim participants on any discussion are treated as if they are great saints and secularist and never confronted upfront with the concurrent facts . I think, before it is too late the Hindus should dominate the Indian news media by both acquiring controlling rights over existing entities and making greenfield initiatives. I am sure there would be enormous pressure on you to retract or apologise from the present ruling dispensation and hosts of pseudo secularists. Needless to say you will never capitulate. I have a clear vision as to how the Indian state is being marginalsed and undermined by our enemies on multiple fronts and where we are leading to. The present ruling dispensation at the centre is by far the most impotent, collection of self seeking squandrels and patently anti Hindu. I consider Mr Manmohan Singh as a typical Babu (who in fact has been through out his life span) who will leave no stone unturned to remain glued to his chair even if that means blatant compromise with national security, ethos and ethics of governance. And that Italian lady the less said the better. When history will be written the rule by the present dispensation will be considered as one of the darkest period in Indian history.

  13. allwin says:

    Excellent article.

  14. Balaji says:

    This article is purely Mind blogging,
    @dominic, @FaroqAbbas:

    I just want to say one thing to you, in the name of religion Muslim and Christina communities have looted all India’s wealth and history speaks for it. Dont try to hide the facts and don’t try to make your words (as if they are), because if u refer the Indian history you can see, how Hindus were tortured by Muslim rulers if they didn’t want to convert. So much of atrocities has happened in Bharat because the Christian and Muslim religion.

    You spoiled my country and still you are. I don’t say all my mulsim brothers are terrorists, but some get brain washed and some become terrorists.

    Our Bharat has not invaded any country and this can be known from history, only the Muslim and the christian communities has invaded countries for Money and religion.

    I just want to say one thing to my fellow christian and muslim brothers, none of you are Muslim or christian, if you analyze your roots all were Hindus, conversion turned you into an Muslim or christian, stop this conversion and stop spreading bad thoughts about hinduism.

    For conversion you speak ill of Hinduism and convert , have we converted any one by speaking ill of Muslim or christian religion? we haven’t, its only you who does all this nonsensical things. Hope you change at-least in the near future or else the forces of nature will change you permanently.

    God save my Country :)

  15. Farooq Abbas says:

    Dear Balaji,
    It appears that you have not cared to ponder over my remarks even slightly, if the Muslims had been converting Hindus by force, then in the 800 years of Muslim rule, there would not have been any Hindu left in India. 800 years are no small things.
    In fact the Muslims enriched India in every sense of the word, and this was because, Islam has a better ideology to organise and manage human affairs than the corrupted Western Captalism under which an entire humanity in condemned- Muslims, Hindus and Christians.
    I have no intention of defending the excesses committed by some rulers who were Muslims, just as excesses were committed by Hindu rulers.

    • frostbite says:

      Dear Farooq, as much as u have been brainwashed, but its a lie when you say muslim ruled for 800 years.
      #1- There were hindu rulers like the rajpoots, marhattas, who kept fighting.
      #2- Shivaji established the maratha empire under the nose of the TYRANT BLIND SACHHA MUSLIM called Aurangzeb. The kings of Garhwal, now Uttarakhand officially kicked mughal asses.(see there is no historical tomb or mosque there)
      #3- The sikhs kept on fighting.
      #4- Remember jijya? pay tax or convert.
      #5- Muslims tried and still trying their ass off to convert everyone into muslim.
      #6- Last but not the least, india should have gotten rid of all the muslims who breed like (i dun wanna take the filthy animal’s name) at the time of division.
      #7- Muslim will demand another nation when they reach 40% .

  16. Madhusuthan says:

    @Frooq Abbas You may be right in saying that some Muslim rulers like Akbar were liberal and whereas Babar, Aurangazeb were fanatics, and the Englishmen who ruled India gave English education, All this we have to acknowledge, but the debate is how a miniscule of Muslim youths who has radical thinking is destroying the fabric called secularism. Is it not our duty to prevent such attacks on innocent people, and educate the wayward youths to join the main stream?

  17. Pingback: Tamil Brahmins are very proud of Dr.Subramanian Swamy for he is the reincarnation of Parasurama « Tamilbrahmins

  18. ravee says:

    Dear Mr.Swamy,We are happy to accept your TRUTH statement which all indians emotions came out in your mouth.Thank you fight against terrorisum and corrpution we(INDIANS) and GOD is with you.Please please Bring GOOD INDIA

  19. Balaji says:

    @dominic, @FaroqAbbas:
    I request you both to read this article from below link first,

    http://www.francoisgautier.com/en-art/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=92&Itemid=57

  20. slimy says:

    @Farooq Abbas

    temples of varanasi(kashi vishwanath), mathura, ayodhya, somnath, taj mahal(tejo mahalaya) were converted or destroyed/disfigured and replaced. this is archeological proof that the muslim rule was by force. some rulers might have been benevolent like akbar but most of them were cruel and unsympathetic.

    if one looks at the indian and even the pakistani and bangla muslims today one has to acknowledge that they have had indian ancestors. even in pakistan today clan identity is maintained and people keep names like butt(bhat/brahmin), chowdary, malik(mallik).

    most of the muslim rulers in india had turkic/mongol lineage and were mostly from the border areas of today’s turkmenistan/uzbekistan/afghanistan/iran. but what is the genetic imprints they have left behind? hardly noticeable in the present indian muslim population. 99% of indian/paki/bangla muslims are still very much indians. some 1% may have turkic roots and none have arabic roots at all.

    only kerala and coastal karnataka muslims have arab ancestory since they were the children of arab traders and local indian women.

  21. AK says:

    @ Farooq

    See what muslims r doing with children in Palestine , this is Islam jehad , this is what is done in terrorist camps of Pak and Bangladesh ,

    Hinduism survived because untruth can’t win over Truth , we were 100 % of India and we were 70% of India at the time of partition ,bcz people hate Islam , u teach hate , u tell that everybody other than muslim is going to hell , nonsense

  22. Raja says:

    Once I had a hope that there will probably be an end to the mindless killing in the name of religion. I hoped may be, just may be one day we’ll live in a world free of terror. But after reading this deliberately misleading and incendiary article, I am left with a very little hope. The article is filled with historical inaccuracies and dangerous bigotry. The article incites violence contrasting the overall peaceful characteristic of Indian philosophy. If Swamy’s recommendation is seriously implemented, a new front of terrorism will rise. The Hindu-terrorism! Hindus putting on their ‘made-in-Hindustan’ suicide vest is the last thing I want to see. Most tragic is Swamy’s ‘tit-for-tat’ strategy because it is coming from the President of an Indian political party, The Janata Party, that is apparently dedicated to the “values and ideals of Gandhiji” as printed on their website! I wonder whether they are talking about the same Gandhiji who is often quoted saying, “an eye for an eye will leave the world blind.” I believe that the sensible Indians have the obligation to prevent this madman from causing harm to India. I think all Indians must stand up against this bully and protect the cherished secularism that India proudly professes. There is no better time than now to wholeheartedly reject the bigoted ideology of Swamy and his followers for the sake of a better and peaceful world. Terrorists of all creeds and colors must be prevented from causing harm to the mankind.

    • janamejayan says:

      First of all you need to be ‘not false’ because your name and the Hindu values don’t match. Second why do you have false hopes that are not based on reality. Third, you are writing that Dr.Swamy’s article is ‘filled with historical inaccuracies’, ‘dangerous bigotry’, ‘incites violence’, ‘Hindu terrorism’, etc. without ever substantiating them? Therefore they are mere false accusations made with malafide intentions. You say it is ‘tit-for-tat’ strategy meaning to condone Islamic violence. In fact there is not one word of condemnation in your whole comment of the horrible islamic violence on the peaceful people of Hindustan. By the way the ‘values and ideals of Gandhiji’ that we talk about is of Mahatma Gandhi and not Sonia Gandhi that you may think!

      By the way let me quote Dr. Carl L. Bankston, Professor of Sociology at Tulane University in New Orleans, LA to counter your accusation of bigotry:

      “There’s another point that I would add to the analysis. Few people know Dr. Swamy’s role in the case of, what came to be known as, the Hashimpura Massacre. While you may read about it at leisure, in brief, Dr. Swamy was the only man standing FOR the massacred Muslims at the time, amidst “lip-service” secularists, who spoke against it and did whatever could be done, albeit with partial success, at best, to bring to justice the master-minds of the crime. So, if at all, the Muslim students at Harvard should feel protected by his presence in the Faculty, in fact the Muslim student community should honor him for it, ‘coz an action is worth a million words, and his action was as decisive as an act of goodness can ever be, whereupon Dr. Swamy put his life for the cause of restoring the right to life and dignity of Muslims in India.”

      So now get back to the part of Pakistan that your ilks stole from us and stop sermonizing us!

      Janamejayan

      • Raja says:

        I don’t think I have to go anywhere for supporting the well being of minorities. There are people more than you can think of who will be at my side in this noble cause. The first and foremost responsibility of a democratic nation is to protect the rights and lives of minorities. No one can think of India without its Muslim population. I do not have much faith in Religion in general, but protecting human rights is the core principle of Indian philosophy. It is not a Hindu nation, and will never be. It is a secular nation (with its own limitations), and there is no force in the world that can prevent me from exercising my rights as a citizen. If you guys can ever make the country a Hindu nation, tell me then. Until that happens stop threatening. As a secularist, I have the same right as everybody else, including a Hindu fanatic as yourself.

      • janamejayan says:

        And Mr. Raja, a secularist is a blind anti-Hindu fanatic and you are one of them! Your insinuation that we Hindus do not tolerate or permit other faiths is a total fabrication of your mindset. Go back in History and you will find that we Hindus alone protected other faiths whereas other religions were historically quite intolerant in the countries of their origin/expansion. You somehow continue to maintain that Hindus are fanatics and they are against minorities. Stop this falsehood. And finally you do not have the courtesy to admit that your accusations against Dr.Swamy was wrong. You will be a man when you can accept reality atleast when shown to you and if you don’t then you have some growing up to do.

        Pl. read my latest posting: The secularists who falsely accuse Hindus as fundamentalists and anti-minority should reads this and have the guts to admit that they are wrong about Hindus

        You should really go to Pakistan to preach your demand for minority rights!

    • Anti-Islam-Terrorist says:

      Raja,

      The first and foremost responsibility of a democratic nation is to protect the rights and lives of all its citizens, not just minorities. Ironically, the rights and lives of the majority (Hindus) is at stake in India and unfortunately, at the hands of the minority (muslims). The article is about protecting the identity, lives and rights of that majority and you seem to be missing this point.

  23. LouiseJP says:

    good luck with getting rid of the cancerous islamic death cult.. from a Christian who rather have India filled with Hindu people than islamic killers.

  24. Terence57 says:

    Dr. Swamy, only good can come from your (so I hear) expulsion from Harvard. May that institution rot in hell.

    Islam is at war with ‘the other’ and we in the U.S. are still playing catch-up. Our Constitution protects religious worship and islam has played that card well, too well, perhaps. By invoking the totality of islam and their shariah, muslims by their own words have crossed the boundaries of, in common parlance, church and state. Ironically, it,is within our power to declare islam itself something ‘other’ than religion, to define it as the totalitarian threat that it is, and to deal with it appropriately from then on. The mistake that the world has made since our founding has been to assume that the tolerance of this most tolerant of nations is unending.

  25. Pingback: Subramanian Swamy Hits Back at Terror-Coddling Harvard Professors Who Got Him Fired – Donald Douglas « Janamejayan’s Weblog

  26. Pingback: Subramanian Swamy Hits Back at Terror-Coddling Harvard Professors Who Got Him Fired – Donald Douglas « Tamilbrahmins

  27. Pingback: Subramanian Swamy Hits Back at Terror-Coddling Harvard Professors Who Got Him Fired – Donald Douglas « From barmaid to empress of India Sonia is our curse and lament

  28. Pingback: Subramanian Swamy Hits Back at Terror-Coddling Harvard Professors Who Got Him Fired – Donald Douglas « The Myth of Capitalism and its asuric Aura

  29. Pingback: ‘Nakkeeran’s Goebellian tactics was the cause of arresting Kanchi Acharya. Now after Jayalalitha sacked Sasikala the yellow journal turn against Jayaed on « Tamilbrahmins

  30. Pingback: The three Stages of Jehaad… Excellent Video « Janamejayan’s Weblog

  31. Pingback: The three Stages of Jehaad… Excellent Video « Tamilbrahmins

  32. Raman says:

    It is a great article by Dr.Swamy ,one of th best I have read in recent times completely enumerating the onslkaught of the muslim rulers.But that was due to a great extent caused by the impotency of the Hindu rulers of that period who were a divided house as we are seeing at present and this was cleverly utilised by the Muslim invaders to their advantage and they not only looted the precious treasures but also converted millions by threats of all sorts and Babar and Aurangazeb excelled in that.Sonebody has made a comment by hiding his real name and I can presume he must be a muslim who without knowing anything about the Indian history made stupid comments on the topic.We Indian are always divided whether during the days of muslims,british and the same trend continues even now.Otherwise a country of 1.2 billion can’t be dictated by a bar tenderer Sonia descended on India becoz of the stupid Rajiv Gandhi who was a lameduck fellow and handed over the country to the Italian mafia who is exploiting the hindus to the hilt and by joining the muslims to rule.Unless that witch and her son are thrown out of India there can’t be any hope for the people.The Congress though they claim to be the descendents of original Congress is actually carved out of the original Congress by Indira in 1969 and so the present Congress is only Congress(Indira) and not the original congress and has only a life of 42 years and not 125 years as the stupid congress people boast.The Constitution has been made in such a way to declare our country a sovereign democratic republic.The coinage of secularism was later inserted by the Congress to woo the muslim and christian voters as if the Congress is the champion of muslim an christian causes and thus they are hoodwinking for the past 5 decades.Now becoz of this policy of appeasement muslims and christians have spread their tentacles like an octopus everywhere and muslims have surpassed christians.In Keral half of the state is dominbated by muslims.So too UP and some other states and hence the effort to woo them by Congress to be in power.So unless the presnt dispensation at the Centre are thrown out hindus can’t have any breathing space.People like Digvijay,Kapil Sibal and such other idiots shuld be thrown out in the Bay of Bengal for relief.

  33. KAPIL says:

    Hello Dr. Swamy,
    The article published by you is true. But, this cannot be neglected that there are also some muslims who love other religions and want global peace.
    If someone really wants to put an end to any kind of religious terrorism, then he have to follow
    TEACHINGS OF BHAGWAN SHRI KRISHNA. Conceptually, good people from BUDDHISTS, JEWS, CHRISTIANS, ISLAM & OTHER RELIGIONS are to be brought to the table along with us (HINDUS) to discuss peacefully about putting end to terrorism.

  34. blazingesh says:

    actually i appreciate swami’s bravery for publishing this article even though he knows that there is no personal gain if he publishes this article [ not to mention his Harvard job at stake] ….
    he knew that he will be heavily critizised by pseudo- secularists and congress will use him during elections!!….still he had the courage to publish this!!….

    and pls read this wikipedia article if u think muslim rulers were very tolerant ….
    hindus struggled to maintain their identity….

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_of_non-Muslim_places_of_worship_into_mosques

    after reading this i am sure that you will start hating ghazni to the core!!….

  35. hindustani says:

    jab tak is desh me congress hai ,kuch bhi nahi ho sakta.mai manav bomb ban kar in par fat jana chahta ho. In muslamano ko us language me sajhana chaheea jo in ko samjh aatee hai.I want HINDU REPABLIC HINDUSTAN

  36. hindustani says:

    aaj jo baba ram dev k saath huaa agar keece mulla mulana k saath hua hota to pata hai kaya hota pablic proprty, low and order, peace khtam ho jata.bhai log mai soch raha hu kya ham se galti ho gai.par tenshan nahi lena,puri duneea mai aaj yehee log mar rhai hai. Bhagwan ne kaha tha jab dharm ke hani hogi.un ko anna parega.par bhagwan bhi kya kre jab ham log kutch zjada he bare dil wale ho.aaj agar sanjay gandhi ji hote to halat kuch or hote.par maa ne vot ke khatir beta maar deya.hey re congress. Hinduon ka cong ko vot karna paap hai.bjp ko vot karna mahapaap.sharm ke bat hai hindustan me mandir nahi ban saka, kuch seekho sikhon se,pakistan main bhi gurudware hai. Kab shuru ho ga DHARM YOUDH

  37. hindustani says:

    congress k digvijay lagta hai kici mulaa ka najayzes beta hai.use har bat main hindu terriest,rss dekahi dete hain. DV tenshen nahi lena tu mare ga to hindu k haath se. Tune H…T bole bole kr 1 hindu terrist to bna diya. Bus ab our nahi.kapil,So..Sites band bhi krvade par cong ko ab ko e nahi bacha skta.jis ko bhi apne DHARM se payer hai,vo cogress ko vote nahi kre ga.kyon ke in ka blood bohut pehle mix ho chuka hai.

  38. True Indian says:

    Dr. Swami should be the prime minister of India. Only he can return India its ancient glory.

  39. RSS says:

    Excellent article, it opens up to the old wounds of the past (Of India and Hinduism) which may never heal with Congress winning every election by Deceit and Adharma. I guess only God can save us from this Evil Government which is Hell bent to take us back to Ghazni & Ghori’s Glorious days.

  40. Siva says:

    Hindu themselves are not united..HIndusim has the caste system which forced low castes to convert…HIndu unity is impossible with varna system..I am a non brahmin and brahmins always look down on me ar work..so I support a Muslim friend rather than a fanatic brahmin

  41. lakshman says:

    Dr.Subramaniam’s article is a eyeopener for Hindus.Islam is a evil social cancer not
    only in India but throught civilised world

  42. Nikhil says:

    Really, an eye opener.

  43. ssdgh11 says:

    Islam must be destroyed,no matter the cost.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s